Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to reduce heart failure hospitalization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aims: Anaemia is common in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), worsening functional status and prognosis. The role of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to reduce hospitalization remains unclear.
Methods and results: A pre-registered systematic search was performed of randomized controlled trials in adults with CHF and anaemia, comparing any ESA at any dose versus placebo or no treatment.Fourteen trials were included with 3128 participants, with moderate quality of evidence for most outcomes and variable risk of bias. Meta-analysis during 5604 person-years of follow-up demonstrated no significant difference in first CHF hospitalization comparing ESAs with control: Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.78-1.10, P = .37; trial heterogeneity I2 = 36%. ESAs significantly reduced total CHF hospitalization with 622 events/2698 person-years, compared with 761/2914 person-years for control: incidence rate ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.90, P < .001; no heterogeneity between trials, I2 = 0%. There were no significant differences between treatment groups for all-cause mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.86-1.18, P = .88; I2 = 35%) or incident adverse events. Patients randomized to ESAs increased their haemoglobin level [mean difference (MD) 1.6 g/dL compared with control, 95% CI 1.6-1.7, P < .001] and exercise tolerance (MD 69 metres, 95% CI 17-122, P = .009), with lower NYHA class on follow-up (MD -0.73 class, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.36, P < .001).
Conclusion: ESA treatment in patients…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,128 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.