Evidence Hub

The Impact of GLP-1-Based Therapies on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Chuang SM, Liu SC, Chien KL, Lin CJ, Tsai MC, Shih HM

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

97,173 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aims: To provide updated agent-level comparative estimates of GLP-1-based therapies for cardiovascular outcomes in adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a hazard ratio (HR)-based systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched through December 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating GLP-1-based therapies in adults with T2DM and reporting time-to-event cardiovascular outcomes. Pairwise meta-analyses and a frequentist random-effects NMA were performed for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and non-fatal stroke.

Results: Fifteen trials involving 97,173 participants were included. In pairwise placebo-controlled analyses, GLP-1-based therapies significantly reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE. In the NMA, mortality estimates for several agents favoured benefit, although most comparisons were not statistically significant. For MACE, efpeglenatide, albiglutide and injectable semaglutide showed the most favourable comparative profiles. Albiglutide reduced non-fatal MI versus placebo, whereas non-fatal stroke estimates were imprecise.

Conclusions: GLP-1-based therapies were associated with an overall favourable cardiovascular profile in T2DM. Pairwise analyses supported class-level benefit, whereas between-agent differences were more evident for MACE than for mortality outcomes in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 97,173 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free