Evidence Hub

Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on body weight and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in patients with and without type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Huang R, Wang B

The Journal of international medical research, 2026

26,088 participants

Abstract

ObjectiveGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are established for weight management and cardiovascular risk reduction, with emerging evidence for kidney protection. Whether albuminuria-lowering effects extend to nondiabetic chronic kidney disease remains uncertain.MethodsWe performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with placebo or standard care. Primary outcomes were change in body weight (kg) and percentage change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; change in estimated glomerular filtration rate was the secondary outcome. We conducted prespecified subgroup analyses (including glycemic status) and random-effects meta-regression to explore heterogeneity. Risk of bias assessment (2.0), small-study effects (funnel plot and trim-and-fill analyses), sensitivity analyses (leave-one-out and low-risk-only), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty ratings were applied.ResultsTen trials (n = 26,088) were included. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists reduced body weight (mean difference, -5.85 kg; 95% confidence interval: -7.78 to -3.92) with a consistent direction of effect across studies despite heterogeneity. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists lowered urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio overall (mean difference, -27.94%; 95% confidence interval: -37.72 to -18.15). Stratified…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 26,088 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free