Perioperative continuous vs. interrupted oral anticoagulation in TAVR: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with continuous versus interrupted oral anticoagulation strategies during the perioperative period of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, with a focus on balancing thromboembolic and bleeding risks.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid and Embase up to February 2026. All studies compared continuous oral anticoagulation versus interruption of oral anticoagulation for TAVI. The primary outcomes were major bleeding, major vascular complications, and stroke. Data synthesis was performed by calculating risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs), each accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251070176).
Results: A total of five studies comprising 3,316 patients were included. Compared with interrupted anticoagulation, continued OAC was not associated with a statistically significant increase in major bleeding or major vascular complications. Continued OAC showed a borderline association with a lower risk of stroke, together with lower red blood cell transfusion and higher device success rates. However, given the limited number of studies, the predominance of retrospective evidence, and the trial sequential analysis findings, these results should be interpreted cautiously.
Conclusion: Continuation of OAC during TAVR appears feasible and was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding or major…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,316 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.