Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Combined Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kaur R, Singh A

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

97 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aims: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) confers substantial cardiovascular and renal morbidity. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated cardiorenal protection across major randomised trials, culminating in the landmark FLOW trial. No prior systematic review has simultaneously synthesised cardiorenal outcomes in a CKD-restricted population, executed a network meta-analysis for agent-level comparisons, or assessed whether SGLT2 inhibitor background therapy modifies treatment effects.

Materials and methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched through March 2025. Eligible RCTs enrolled adults with CKD (eGFR 2 or UACR ≥ 30 mg/g) comparing GLP-1 RAs versus placebo for ≥ 26 weeks. Primary outcomes were 3-point MACE and a KDIGO-harmonised composite kidney endpoint. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and a frequentist NMA were performed. GRADE certainty was assigned to all outcomes.

Results: Thirteen RCTs (97 428 participants; 31 846 with confirmed CKD) were included. GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89; high certainty) and the composite kidney endpoint by 21% (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.86; high certainty). Kidney failure risk was reduced by 28% (HR 0.72); UACR decreased by 26%. Benefits were consistent irrespective of SGLT2 inhibitor background use (interaction p = 0.41). Semaglutide ranked highest in the NMA (SUCRA 78.4%). No excess acute kidney injury risk was observed.

Conclusions: GLP-1 RAs provide clinically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 97 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free