Evidence Hub

Endogenous sex steroid hormones, sex hormone binding globulin and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with established cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Amiri M, Raeisi-Dehkordi H, Beigrezaei S, Chatelan A, Franco OH, Voortman T, Muka T

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

5,981 participants

Abstract

Background: Endogenous sex steroid hormones are involved in numerous regulatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system and their imbalances are frequently observed in patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, their prognostic significance for mortality remains unclear. This study aims to systematically synthesize existing research and quantify the association between endogenous sex steroid hormones, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with established CVD.

Methods: Six bibliographic databases were systematically searched. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, comparing the highest versus lowest levels of sex hormones/SHBG. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Exposures).

Results: Twelve studies with a total of 5,981 patients with established CVD were included. No significant association was found between endogenous total testosterone and risk of all-cause ((HR (95%CI): 0.78 (0.56 to 1.09), n= 5 studies) or CVD (HR (95%CI): 1.30 (0.28 to 6.01), n= 3) mortality in men. Most studies (seven out of twelve studies) were classified as having a high risk of bias, particularly due to confounding.

Conclusions: We found no evidence for an association between endogenous sex hormones and mortality outcomes in patients with CVD. This study underscored the lack of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,981 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free