Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Maintenance Therapy Strategies for Quality of Life in COPD: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Inhaled maintenance therapies are central to the long-term management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their comparative effects on health-related quality of life across the treatment-escalation pathway remain unclear. This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis compared major inhaled treatment strategies using change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score as the primary outcome, with exploratory assessment of safety.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 21, 2025, with supplementary citation tracking and ClinicalTrials.gov screening. Randomized controlled trials in stable COPD comparing placebo, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA), inhaled corticosteroid plus LABA (ICS+LABA), LABA plus LAMA (LABA+LAMA), or triple therapy were included. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was performed. Transcriptomic analyses were conducted only as exploratory mechanistic contextualization and were not treated as primary clinical endpoints.
Results: Fourteen randomized trials were included. Triple therapy showed the greatest improvement in SGRQ total score versus placebo (mean difference [MD] -3.99; 95% credible interval [CrI] -5.86 to -2.16) and ranked highest by surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Compared with LABA+LAMA, triple therapy was associated with greater improvement in SGRQ total score…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.