Evidence Hub

First-Line treatment for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and high-risk subgroups

Zhong D, Cheng H, Zeng L, Tian C, Liang C, Wei H, Xu M, Pang M et al.

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

3,162 participants

Abstract

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based regimens have emerged as the first-line standard of care for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), yet direct head-to-head comparisons between individual regimens remain limited. The systematic review identified 11 eligible randomised controlled trials; 6 of these, involving 3162 patients, entered the Bayesian network meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and benefits in the cytogenetically high-risk subgroup across 7 treatment nodes, keeping the dexamethasone-sparing IFM2017-03 schedule (D-R-limited dexamethasone) separate from continuous D-Rd. All four anti-CD38-containing regimens improved progression-free survival (PFS) relative to lenalidomide-dexamethasone, with D-VRd ranking highest (SUCRA 81.5%). For overall survival (OS), D-R-limited dexamethasone ranked highest (SUCRA 87.4%), but OS follow-up is considerably less mature for the quadruplet trials, and no pairwise comparison among the anti-CD38-containing regimens reached significance for either outcome. High-risk subgroup estimates could not rank regimens against one another, but both daratumumab-lenalidomide regimens retained a progression-free survival benefit relative to lenalidomide-dexamethasone. Regarding safety, several anti-CD38-containing regimens increased grade ≥3 neutropenia, whereas infection signals were regimen- and endpoint-specific. This study provides comprehensive evidence to inform individualized first-line…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,162 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free