Evidence Hub

A Phase III randomized controlled trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer

N. Van As, C. Griffin, A. Tree, Jaymini Patel, P. Ostler, H. van der Voet, A. Loblaw, William Chu et al.

New England Journal of Medicine, 2024

874 participants · 167 citations

Abstract

Background PACE-B aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) compared to conventionally or moderately hypo-fractionated regimens for biochemical and/or clinical failure for localised prostate cancer. Methods PACE-B is an international phase III open-label randomised controlled trial. Men with stage T1-T2 prostate cancer, Gleason ≤3+4, PSA ≤20 ng/mL were randomized (1:1) to SBRT (36.25 gray (Gy) in 5 fractions (f) over 1-2 weeks) or control radiotherapy (CRT) (78Gy/39f over 7.5 weeks, or 62Gy/20f over 4 weeks). Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. The primary endpoint was freedom from biochemical/clinical failure with a critical hazard ratio for non-inferiority of 1.45. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results 874 patients were randomised from 38 centers (CRT=441, SBRT=433) between August 2012 and January 2018. Median age was 69.8 years, median PSA 8.0 ng/mL, NCCN risk group was 9.3% low, 90.7% intermediate. After 74.0 months median follow-up, 5-year biochemical/clinical failure free-rate (95% CI) was CRT: 94.6% (91.9%, 96.4%) vs SBRT: 95.8% (93.3%, 97.4%). SBRT was non-inferior to CRT with unadjusted hazard ratio 0.73 (90% CI: 0.48, 1.12; p-value for non-inferiority 0.004). To 5 years, cumulative rate of late RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity was CRT: 18.3% (95%CI 14.8, 22.5%) vs. SBRT: 26.9% (95%CI 22.8, 31.5%) (p<0.001) and for gastrointestinal toxicity was CRT: 10.2% (95%CI 7.7, 13.5%) vs. SBRT: 10.7% (95%CI 8.1,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 874 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free