Evidence Hub

Comparative Effectiveness of Sildenafil versus Tadalafil as Companion Therapy to Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Invasive Hemodynamic Data

A. Abdelmassih, Nada AlSaqqa

Journal of Pediatric Pulmonology, 2025

160 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background: Combination therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) is widely used for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). While ERA/Sildenafil combinations were once common, suggestions exist that sildenafil bioavailability is reduced by ERA co-administration. This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of ERA/Sildenafil versus ERA/Tadalafil in treating PAH by analyzing invasive hemodynamic data. Methodology: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using keywords (ERA, Sildenafil, Tadalafil, PAH) in PubMed, Embase, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection, and Wiley/Cochrane Library. The search included clinical trials and observational studies published up to July 2024, comparing ERA/Sildenafil and ERA/Tadalafil regimens reporting invasive hemodynamic measurements (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR]). A meta-analysis was performed using Julius Artificial intelligence software (applying Python tools in data analysis) to assess statistical significance in PVR and mPAP between the two groups. Results: Two retrospective studies were included, comprising 160 patients in the ERA/Sildenafil regimen and 62 in the ERA/Tadalafil regimen. The mPAP was significantly lower in the ERA/Tadalafil group ( P < 0.001), while a lower PVR was observed in the same group, though achieving less statistical significance ( P = 0.04). Conclusion: This…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 160 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free