Evidence Hub

Effect of long and short half-life PDE5 inhibitors on HbA1c levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Joseph Kim, Rui Zhao, L. Kleinberg, Kitai Kim

EClinicalMedicine, 2024

1,083 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, owing to their mechanism of action, have been gaining recognition as a potential case of drug repurposing and combination therapy for diabetes treatment. We aimed to examine the effect of long and short half-life PDE5 inhibitors have on Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with elevated HbA1c (>6%) to assess mean difference in HbA1c levels from baseline versus controls after any PDE5 inhibitor intervention of ≥4 weeks, excluding multiple interventions. Cochrane CENTRAL, PMC Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP were searched without language restrictions up to September 30, 2024. Summary data from published data were extracted. PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines used to extract and assess data using a random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with the Research Registry, reviewregistry1733. Findings Among 1096 studies identified, in analysis of 13 studies with 1083 baseline patients, long half-life PDE5 inhibitors (tadalafil, PF-00489791) had decreases in HbA1c while short half-life PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, avanafil) had no change. Five (38.5%) studies had a low risk of bias, and eight (61.5%) had some concerns. Long half-life inhibitors had significant mean decrease of −0.40% ([−0.66, −0.14], p = 0.002, I2 = 82%, 7.70% baseline HbA1c). Short half-life inhibitors had insignificant mean difference of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,083 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free