Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of gut microbiome-targeted treatment in patients with depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bo Pan, Yiming Pan, Yu-Song Huang, Meng Yi, Yuwei Hu, Xiaoyu Lian, Hui-Zhong Shi, Mingwei Wang et al.

BMC Psychiatry, 2025

16 citations

Abstract

The study aimed to comprehensively analyze and establish a framework for evaluating the efficacy of microbiome–targeted treatment (MTT) for depression. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MTT in treating depression until October 19, 2023. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MTT. Comprehensive subgroup analyses were undertaken to explore factors influencing MTT’s efficacy in treating depression. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023483649). The study selection process identified 51,570 studies, of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled estimates showed that MTT significantly improved depression symptoms (SMD −0.26, 95% CI [−0.32, −0.19], I2 = 54%) with acceptable safety. Subgroup analyses by geography showed that effectiveness was demonstrated in Asia (SMD −0.46, 95% CI [−0.56, −0.36], I2 = 36%), while no evidence of effectiveness was found in Europe (SMD −0.07, 95% CI [−0.19, 0.05], I2 = 55%), America (SMD −0.33, 95% CI [−0.67, 0.02], I2 = 60%), and Oceania (SMD 0.00, 95% CI [−0.18, 0.18], I2 = 0%). Besides, the efficacy was shown in depressed patients without comorbidities (SMD −0.31, 95% CI [−0.40, −0.22], I2 = 0%), whereas effectiveness was poor in those with digestive disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome (SMD −0.37, 95% CI [−0.89, 0.16], I2 = 74%), chronic diarrhea (SMD −0.34,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free