Evidence Hub

Effects of Infant Formula Supplemented With Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome, Gut Environment, Growth Parameters, and Safety and Tolerance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

M. Kebbe, Kennedy Leung, B. Perrett, Raylene A. Reimer, Kristi B Adamo, Leanne M. Redman

Nutrition reviews, 2025

5,290 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Abstract Context Prebiotics are often added to infant formulas to mimic the benefits of oligosaccharides found in human milk. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of prebiotic-supplemented cow’s milk–based formula on the gut microbiota, gut environment, growth parameters, and safety and tolerance in infants ≤6 months old, compared with a standard formula or human milk comparator. Data Sources Searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses databases. Articles were included that reported on randomized controlled trials, were published from inception until April 2024, and met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data Extraction Outcomes included gut microbiota (eg, diversity; taxa at phylum, family, genus and species levels), gut environment (eg, pH, secretory immunoglobulin A, fecal calprotectin, fecal metabolites), growth parameters (eg, z scores), and safety and tolerance. Fixed or random effects models were used and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were calculated to assess pooled effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RoB 2). Data Analysis A total of 30 articles met inclusion criteria, with 5290 infants included. Whereas effects on Lactobacillus were inconsistent, prebiotic formula supplementation increased Bifidobacterium counts (k = 7 [MD: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71]; I2 = 13%; P < .00001) and decreased fecal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,290 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free