Evidence Hub

Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diversity Indices, Taxa Alterations, and Mortality Risk

Diana-Maria Mateescu, A. Ilie, Ioana Cotet, Cristina Guse, C. Muresan, A. Pah, Marius Badalica-Petrescu, S. Iurciuc et al.

Microorganisms, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

COVID-19 is associated with gut microbiome alterations that may influence disease outcomes through immune and inflammatory pathways. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated global evidence on gut dysbiosis in COVID-19. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to 5 October 2025 (PROSPERO CRD420251160970). Alpha-diversity indices and microbial taxa log-fold changes (logFC) were analyzed using random-effects models. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for the Shannon index was −0.69 (95% CI −0.84 to −0.54; I2 = 42%), confirming reduced microbial diversity. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii showed a significant pooled depletion (logFC = −1.24; 95% CI −1.68 to −0.80; k = 10; I2 = 74%), while Enterococcus spp. was increased (logFC = 1.45; 95% CI 1.12–1.78). Egger’s test did not suggest publication bias (p = 0.32). Gut dysbiosis was consistently associated with reduced microbial diversity and enrichment of pathogenic taxa, correlating with increased disease severity and mortality (HR = 1.67). These findings highlight the potential of microbiome profiling as a prognostic tool in COVID-19, although clinical translation requires further validation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free