Evidence Hub

Influence of gut microbiome composition on treatment efficacy and toxicity in bladder cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis

Atif Hussain Sarwar, H. T. Hashim, A. Q. M. Alhatemi, M. Saddique, Sheena Shamoon

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

2,500 participants

Abstract

768

Background:

The gut microbiome has emerged as a critical factor influencing the efficacy and toxicity of cancer treatments. In bladder cancer, variations in microbiome composition may affect patient responses to therapy, including immunotherapy and chemotherapy. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of gut microbiome composition on treatment outcomes in bladder cancer.

Methods:

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception until June 2024 using relevant keywords. The pooled data were presented as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Random Effects model in OpenMeta (version 5.3). The I

2

and X

2

statistics were used to evaluate inter-study heterogeneity. An I

2

value of >50% was considered significant heterogeneity. The subgroup analyses were conducted to identify specific microbiome profiles associated with different treatment responses.

Results:

A total of 20 studies comprising 2,500 bladder cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with a higher abundance of beneficial bacteria such as

Bifidobacterium

and

Lactobacillus

had significantly better treatment responses (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.8-3.4) and lower toxicity rates (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9). Conversely, an increased presence of pathogenic bacteria like

Clostridium

and

Escherichia coli

was associated with poorer outcomes (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8) and higher toxicity (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7).

Conclusions:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,500 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free