Evidence Hub

Effect of the Gut Microbiome on the reduction of uremic toxins in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review & Network meta-analysis

R. Cedillo-Flores, M. Á. Cuevas Budhart, I. C. Redondo, M. Kappes, M. A. Diaz, R. Sierra

medRxiv, 2025

331 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased intestinal barrier permeability, leading to heightened inflammation and oxidative stress. These changes contribute to complications such as cardiovascular disease, anemia, altered mineral metabolism, and CKD progression. Interventions using prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics may help mitigate dysbiosis and improve intestinal barrier function. Aim This study conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in reducing uremic toxins produced by the gut microbiota in CKD patients. Method A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. The analysis focused on the use of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in CKD patients at stages 3 to 5, as per KDIGO guidelines, and their association with reductions in uremic toxins such as indoxyl sulfate (IS), p-cresyl sulfate (pCS), urea, and creatinine. The study follows the PRISMA statement. Results The studies included 331 patients, primarily male, across CKD stages 3a to 5. The interventions showed a positive impact on the gut microbiota composition, leading to reductions in both free and total p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate. Conclusion The findings suggest that modulating the gut microbiota through these interventions can effectively reduce specific uremic toxins. However, further trials are necessary to better understand the microbiota modulation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 331 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free