Evidence Hub

Gut Microbiota and Central Nervous System Tumors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Microbiome-CNS Interactions

A. Nowacka, Maciej Śniegocki, Dominika Bożiłow, Ewa A. Ziółkowska

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2025

387 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

The gut-brain axis has emerged as a critical pathway influencing central nervous system (CNS) tumor biology through complex microbiome-mediated mechanisms. Understanding these interactions is essential for developing novel therapeutic strategies and biomarkers for CNS tumors. To systematically review and meta-analyze current evidence on gut microbiota interactions with CNS tumors, examining mechanisms, clinical correlations, therapeutic implications, and biomarker potential. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published from 2010–2025. A random-effects meta-analysis of reported statistical outcomes was performed to quantify microbiome alterations using standardized mean differences (Cohen’s d) and diagnostic accuracy measures. Analyses were based on published summary statistics rather than reprocessed raw sequencing data, acknowledging cross-study heterogeneity. From 161 identified records, 12 studies met inclusion criteria (6 clinical studies, n = 387 participants; 6 preclinical studies). Meta-analysis revealed significant Shannon diversity reduction in CNS tumor patients (Cohen’s d = −1.237 [95% CI: −1.614, −0.860; 95% PI: −2.48, −0.12]) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 60.5%). Evidence demonstrated significant gut microbiome alterations with reduced microbial diversity, increased pathogenic bacteria (Akkermansia muciniphila: 2.23-fold increase,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 387 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free