Evidence Hub

Gut microbiome in diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Shuang Zhao, Qi Yan, Wanjing Xu, Juan-Mei Zhang

Microbial Pathogenesis, 2024

211 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT

Changes in the gut microbiome are linked with diabetes mellitus (DM) development, but alterations in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) are still being debated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences in biodiversity and relative abundance of gut microbiome between patients with DR and DM.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and CNKI) from the inception of each database through to August 2023. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using Stata 15.1. Furthermore, the alpha diversity index and relative abundance of the gut microbiome were calculated. The Egger test determined publication bias in the literature.

RESULTS

Seven case-control studies were included in the final dataset, comprising 195 patients with DR and 211 patients with DM. Compared to DM patients, patients in the DR group had a reduced but not significantly different α-diversity. The analysis of microbial composition at the phylum level revealed a marked increase in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes(ES = 23.27, 95%CI[8.30, 38.23], P = 0.000) and a decline in Firmicutes(ES = 47.05, 95%CI[36.58, 57.52], P = 0.000), Proteobacteria (ES = 11.08, 95%CI[6.08, 16.07], P = 0.000) and Actinobacteria (ES = 10.43, 95%CI[1.64, 19.22], P = 0.001) in patients with DR when compared to those with DM.

CONCLUSIONS

An association exists between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 211 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free