Evidence Hub

Genomic co-localization of variation affecting agronomic and human gut microbiome traits in a meta-analysis of diverse sorghum

Nate Korth, Qinnan Yang, M. V. Van Haute, Michael C. Tross, B. Peng, Nikee Shrestha, Mackenzie Zwiener-Malcom, Ravi V. Mural et al.

G3, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Substantial functional metabolic diversity exists within species of cultivated grain crops that directly or indirectly provide more than half of all calories consumed by humans around the globe. While such diversity is the molecular currency used for improving agronomic traits, diversity is poorly characterized for its effects on human nutrition and utilization by gut microbes. Moreover, we know little about agronomic traits’ potential tradeoffs and pleiotropic effects on human nutritional traits. Here, we applied a quantitative genetics approach using a meta-analysis and parallel genome-wide association studies of Sorghum bicolor traits describing changes in the composition and function of human gut microbe communities, and any of 200 sorghum seed and agronomic traits across a diverse sorghum population to identify associated genetic variants. A total of 15 multiple-effect loci (MEL) were initially found where different alleles in the sorghum genome produced changes in seed that affected the abundance of multiple bacterial taxa across 2 human microbiomes in automated in vitro fermentations. Next, parallel genome-wide studies conducted for seed, biochemical, and agronomic traits in the same population identified significant associations within the boundaries of 13/15 MEL for microbiome traits. In several instances, the colocalization of variation affecting gut microbiome and agronomic traits provided hypotheses for causal mechanisms through which variation could…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free