Evidence Hub

Peripheral microbial metabolites as indicators of gut microbiome disruption: systematic review and meta-analysis

Taylor Kain, Eric Armstrong, Bryan Coburn

bioRxiv, 2026

3,242 participants

Abstract

Background Gut microbiome disruption is often characterized by loss of obligate anaerobic bacteria, which may lead to altered production of microbial metabolites that can be detected peripherally. The application of widely used sequencing-based microbiome analyses to clinical settings is limited by cost, turnaround time, and challenges with patients with very low stool output. Since some products of strictly bacterial metabolism detectable in blood, peripheral metabolites may provide a potentially rapid and scalable indicator of gut microbiome composition and function. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting circulating microbial metabolites and gut microbiome composition to evaluate whether peripheral microbial metabolites could identify gut microbiome perturbation. Results Candidate metabolites were identified systematically across an independent set of studies reporting metabolite-microbiome associations, enabling assessment of reproducibility across disease states and cohorts. We performed a meta-analysis of 19 human cohorts comprising 3242 participants with paired blood metabolite and stool microbiome data. Anaerobe depletion (obligate anaerobe relative abundance <0.70 by sequencing) was associated with decreased products of anaerobic microbial metabolism. Combinations of metabolites distinguished individuals with anaerobe-depleted microbiomes from those without. Circulating metabolite levels distinguished between cases and controls with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,242 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free