Evidence Hub

Gut Microbiome as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Early Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 18 Studies across Five Cancer Types

M. Tall

bioRxiv, 2026

2,587 participants

Abstract

Background The gut microbiome has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker for early cancer detection. However, evidence remains fragmented across individual studies with limited cross-cancer comparisons. Objectives To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of gut microbiome-based signatures across five major cancer types: colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and lung cancer (LC). Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2000 – April 2026), following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for microbiome-based cancer classification were included. Pooled AUC estimates were derived using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results Eighteen studies (2,587 participants) met inclusion criteria. Pooled AUC values were: CRC 0.785 (95%CI 0.750–0.819; I2=30.6%), GC 0.834 (0.781–0.887; I2=56.6%), PDAC 0.853 (0.785–0.921; I2=60.8%), HCC 0.809 (0.747–0.871; I2=70.3%), and LC 0.780 (0.738–0.822; I2=25.0%). Fusobacterium nucleatum was consistently enriched across CRC, GC, and PDAC, while Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia muciniphila were depleted in all five cancer types. Porphyromonas gingivalis showed the highest fold-change in PDAC (log■FC=+2.8). Risk of bias was moderate-to-high in all…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,587 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free