Evidence Hub

The effects of AG1® supplementation on the gut microbiome of healthy adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

M. L. La Monica, B. Raub, Shelley Hartshorn, Ashley Gustat, Jodi Grdic, Trevor O. Kirby, J. Townsend, J. Sandrock et al.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2024

15 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background This study aimed to examine the effect of a commercially available multi-ingredient powder (AG1Ⓡ) on the gut microbiome and assess the impact of AG1Ⓡ on GI tolerability and other clinical safety markers in healthy men and women. Methods Using a double-blind, randomized, two-arm, placebo-controlled, parallel design, we examined a 4-week daily supplementation regimen of AG1Ⓡ vs. placebo (PL). Fifteen men and 15 women provided stool samples for microbiome analysis, questionnaires for digestive quality of life (DQLQ), and completed visual analog scales (VAS) and Bristol stool charts to assess stool consistency and bowel frequency before and after the 4-week intervention. Participant’s blood work (CBC, CMP, and lipid panel) was also assessed before and after the 4-week intervention. Alpha diversity was determined by Shannon and Chao1 index scores and evaluated by a two-way ANOVA, beta diversity in taxonomic abundances and functional pathways was visualized using partial least squares-discriminant analyses and statistically evaluated by PERMANOVA. To identify key biomarkers, specific feature differences in taxonomic relative abundance and normalized functional pathway counts were analyzed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe). Questionnaires, clinical safety markers, and hemodynamics were evaluated by mixed factorial ANOVAs with repeated measures. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06181214). Results AG1Ⓡ supplementation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free