Evidence Hub

Gut microbiome and metabolic responses to cricket powder supplementation in Thai subjects with high or borderline-high LDL cholesterol: an exploratory, randomized, crossover controlled trial

A. Prachansuwan, Pitchayaporn Sukkha, Parunya Thiyajai, Pitakthai Chamtim, Sarunya Kitdumrongthum, Pimnapanut Sridonpai, Angkansiri Dee-uam, Karaked Tongdonpo et al.

Current Research in Food Science, 2026

17 participants

Abstract

Edible insects are emerging as sustainable functional foods, yet human evidence for microbiome-mediated effects remains limited, particularly in Asian populations. Therefore, this study investigated whether cricket powder supplementation modulates gut microbiome composition and metabolic outputs in Thai subjects with high or borderline-high LDL cholesterol. In a randomized, crossover controlled trial, 17 subjects received cricket powder or control products for 21 days, separated by a 4-week washout. Gut microbiome composition was profiled using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Blood lipids and gastrointestinal tolerance were also assessed. As a result, cricket powder did not alter overall microbial diversity or community structure but induced targeted species-level shifts, including enrichment of Blautia faecis and Mediterraneibacter glycyrrhizinilyticus. Despite these compositional changes, fecal SCFAs remained unchanged. Notably, branched-chain SCFAs were not increased, indicating no shift toward proteolytic fermentation and preservation of microbial metabolic balance. Gastrointestinal tolerance was maintained without adverse effects. Blood lipid parameters were unchanged, with a modest trend toward increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Collectively, cricket powder induces selective microbiome remodeling without disrupting metabolic homeostasis,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free