Evidence Hub

Enteral Iron Dose Effect on Iron Storage, Intestinal Barrier, and Gut Microbiome in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Justin Gibbons, Rachel M. Nelson, Cristina N Dabrowski, Anita Narkhede, Laura A. Szalacha, Marcia Kneusel, J. Maru, Madison R Huszar et al.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2026

151 participants

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants routinely receive enteral iron supplementation to support growth, replace phlebotomy losses, and prevent iron deficiency. However, concerns regarding potential harms, including those on the gut microbiome, have contributed to recommendations for lower dosing. Objective: To compare the effects of two enteral iron doses on gut health in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. We hypothesized that higher iron dose would increase abundances of pathogenic bacteria, intestinal inflammation, and barrier dysfunction. Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial assigned preterm infants born <1500 g to receive either the recommended dose, 2 mg/kg/day, or a higher dose of 6 mg/kg/day of total enteral iron. The primary outcome was the fecal microbiome after 2 weeks on iron, assessed by metagenomic sequencing. Secondary outcomes included biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and barrier function (fecal calprotectin, urinary claudin-3, and urinary intestinal fatty acid-binding protein). Iron status, adverse events, and auditory brainstem response latencies at 36 weeks postmenstrual age were also evaluated. Results: Among 151 randomized infants who received study iron (77 low-dose; 74 high-dose), bacterial diversity, individual taxa, virulence potential, bacterial overgrowth, and iron-related functional genes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. In subgroup analysis of singletons, treatment groups demonstrated significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 151 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free