Evidence Hub

Long-term clinical outcomes with nivolumab/ipilimumab with or without Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI588 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A randomized phase Ib clinical trial

M. Zugman, H. Ebrahimi, Luis A. Meza, R. Barragán-Carrillo, Xiao-Chen Li, Marian Llamas-Quitiquit, J. Hsu, Z. Zengin et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

4550

Background:

In two randomized phase I trials,

Clostridium butyricum

MIYAIRI588 (CBM588), a live biotherapeutic, demonstrated preliminary activity in modulating the gut microbiome, enhancing systemic immune responses, and improving clinical outcomes in patients receiving first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab and nivolumab/cabozantinib for mRCC (Dizman

et al.

and Ebrahimi

et al.

Nature Medicine). Herein, we present the long-term follow-up data for nivolumab/ipilimumab with or without CBM588.

Methods:

Newly diagnosed patients with mRCC, clear cell and/or sarcomatoid histology, and International mRCC Database Consortium intermediate/high risk were randomized to receive nivolumab/ipilimumab with or without CBM588 in a 2:1 ratio. Response outcomes were assessed using RECIST 1.1. Clinical outcomes were secondary endpoints. Objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]), disease control rate (DCR; CR, PR, or stable disease [SD] > 6 months), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes were compared across arms.

Results:

Twenty-nine patients were included in the final analysis: 19 in the nivolumab/ipilimumab with CBM588 arm and 10 in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm. The median age was 66.2 years, 72% were male, 83% had IMDC intermediate risk and 93% had clear cell histology. Baseline characteristics were similar across arms. ORR and DCR were 58% and 79% in nivolumab/ipilimumab with CBM588 arm versus 20% and 20% in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free