Evidence Hub

Randomized study to assess colonic microbiome changes in response to energy drink consumption (ROSANNA trial)

Tim Jang, D. Kahramangil, Ji-Hyun Lee, George P. Kim, Krista P. Terracina, Johan Nordenstam, Thomas E. Read, Ryan M Thomas et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024

60 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

TPS3630 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US, is increasingly diagnosed in individuals under 50. This rise in early-onset CRC (eoCRC) led the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force to recommend a reduction in the age to begin colorectal cancer screening in average-risk persons, from 50 to 45. The etiology of eoCRC is multifaceted, with one postulated theory pointing to alterations in the young adult colonic microbiome. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) producing bacteria, like Bilophila wadsworthia, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Atopobium parvulum, are typically minor gut microbiota components but are overrepresented in CRC cases, linked to inflammation, and may promote a pro-carcinogenic environment. These bacteria preferentially use taurine, an essential amino acid, as a primary energy source. Energy drinks represent one of the largest dietary sources (6-16x normal daily intake) of taurine in contemporary diets. Our hypothesis is that high taurine levels in energy drinks could exacerbate CRC risk by promoting preferential growth and metabolic activities of already present H2S-producing bacteria, contributing to the rise of eoCRC. Methods: This randomized open-label trial is actively enrolling up to 60 young adults (18-40 years) without personal or family history of CRC, other major GI disease/distress, and baseline infrequent energy drink consumption. Group 1 (Arm A; n=30), will consist of subjects consuming at least one of two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free