Evidence Hub

Mixed feeding and mode of birth modulate the effects of a hydrolyzed synbiotic formula on the gut microbiome in infants at risk of atopic disease

Evangelia Intze, Monika Schaubeck, Bianca M Arendt, Manja Fleddermann, Kirsten Beyer, Thomas Clavel, Ilias Lagkouvardos, Thomas C. A. Hitch

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2026

342 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Intestinal colonization by microbial communities is important for infant health. Little knowledge about the effect of infant formula matrix (i.e. form of protein) on the infant microbiome is available. The main aim of this study was to investigate how mode of birth, cessation of breastfeeding, and the formula matrix i.e. protein matrix of synbiotic infant formulas modulate intestinal colonization in infants.

METHODS

Stool microbiota profiles of 342 healthy term infants participating in a randomized controlled trial were studied. Infants received synbiotic infant formula manufactured from extensively hydrolyzed (eHF) or intact protein (control formula; CF) as exclusive formula feeding or as mixed feeding (MF) with human milk. Stool samples at 4 and 12 months of age were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.

RESULTS

Phylogenetic profiles of the stool microbiota showed age-dependent maturation. Protein hydrolyzation had only minor effects on overall community types. However, compared to CF, eHF feeding was linked to a Bifidobacterium-dominated microbiota at 4 months of age in two subgroups: in infants born by Cesarean section and those who had received MF for less than 3 months.

CONCLUSION

In this comparison of two synbiotic infant formulas, the formula matrix based on hydrolyzed protein was linked to a Bifidobacterium-dominated community, dependent on birth and feeding mode. Because bifidobacteria are positively linked to infant health and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 342 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free