Evidence Hub

Oral-associated bacteria in the gut microbiome of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of metagenomic data

R. Franco-Duarte, Z. Saati-Santamaría, Phannaphat Choowong, Gangani Dharmarathne, Esther Menéndez, P. Soares, Teresa Rito, W. Cheung et al.

BMC Oral Health, 2025

1,224 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

With an astounding global prevalence, both diabetes mellitus and gum disease pose significant health concerns. Gum disease has been identified as a risk factor for diabetes mellitus, and its treatment has shown improvements in markers of glucose management. We hypothesised that bacteria commonly associated with the oral microbiome could be disproportionately present in the gut of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared to healthy controls, suggesting a possible association between oral-associated bacteria and metabolic dysregulation. This hypothesis is supported by known interactions between the oral microbiome and systemic health, particularly the role of inflammation in both conditions. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a secondary analysis of whole-genomic sequencing data of studies published over the last twenty years (2004–2024) related to the gut microbiome of patients with T2DM to identify oral-associated bacteria in their gut compared to healthy individuals. We searched for studies related to the gut microbiome, whole metagenomics, and T2DM in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Studies that included whole metagenomic data from adult populations of all genders with T2DM were selected, resulting in the reanalysis of metagenomic sequencing data from a total of 9 studies (n = 1,224 metagenomes) for bacterial species data. From the 41,689 gut microbial species identified across the selected studies, 497 were classified as of oral-associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,224 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free