Evidence Hub

Effects of dietary energy restriction of ultra-processed foods compared to a generic energy restriction on the intestinal microbiota of individuals with obesity: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Ana Debora Santos de Oliveira, Nayara Gomes Graciliano, D. R. Silva, Mateus de Lima Macena, André Eduardo da Silva-Júnior, M. R. Pereira, J. V. L. Santos, Maria Bárbara Galdino Silva et al.

Food & Function, 2025

43 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the intake of ultra-processed foods (UPF) influences gut microbiota. The present study evaluated the impact of energy restriction of dietary UPF compared to a general energy restriction on the gut microbiota of individuals with obesity. This was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. Individuals with obesity were randomly allocated into two groups: control, with general energy restriction (ER-G), and intervention, with energy restriction associated with UPF restriction (ER-UPF), limited to 5% of total intake. Individuals were followed-up monthly for 6 months. Stool samples were collected at baseline and after 6 months for DNA extraction and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 region). Socioeconomic, clinical, anthropometric, and dietary intake data were also collected. Abundance of microbiota data was analyzed using the Linear Models for Microarray Data (limma-voom) and the Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models (MaAsLin2) packages, with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction method. Alpha-diversity was analyzed using the Shannon, Simpson and Simpson-inverse index, whereas beta-diversity was analyzed using the Bray-Curtis index with the PERMANOVA test. Other variables were analyzed using mixed ANOVA with an alpha level of 5%. A total of 43 individuals were included, and at the end of the study, 34 individuals (18 intervention and 16 control) had complete data and were analyzed. %UPF consumption significantly decreased in the group that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 43 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free