Evidence Hub

Gut microbiome and immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity

R. Verheijden, M. J. V. van Eijs, F. Paganelli, Marco C. Viveen, M. Rogers, Janetta Top, A. M. May, J. H. van de Wijgert et al.

European Journal of Cancer, 2025

195 participants · 27 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have suggested that gut microbiome may influence immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy, but its association with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is less well studied. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed whether gut microbiome composition at start, or changes during ICI, are associated with severe irAEs.

METHODS

Stool samples of cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomic shotgun sequencing. Differences in alpha and beta diversity between patients with and without severe irAE were assessed, as well as differential relative abundance (RA) of taxa, MetaCyc pathways, and seven prespecified literature-based bacterial groups including pathobionts and Ruminococcaceae.

FINDINGS

We analyzed 497 samples of 195 patients before and soon after starting ICI, at severe irAE onset and after starting immunosuppression. Mean RA of the pathobionts group was significantly higher in patients who developed a severe irAE (8.2 %) compared to those who did not (4.8 %; odds ratio 1.40; 95 %CI 1.07-1.87) at baseline, and also early during ICI treatment and at severe irAE onset. A significantly stronger decrease in RA of Ruminococcaceae after starting ICI was observed in patients who developed a severe irAE compared to those who did not. RAs of Ruminococcaceae, the genus Ruminococcus, and the species R. bromii and R. callidus were significantly lower at severe irAE onset compared to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 195 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free