Evidence Hub

Feeding practice influences gut microbiome composition in very low birth weight preterm infants and the association with oxidative stress: A prospective cohort study

C. Cai, Zheng-Xiao Zhang, M. Morales, Ya-Nan Wang, E. Khafipour, J. Friel

Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 2019

20 participants · 75 citations

Abstract

Knowledge about the development of the preterm infant gut microbiota is emerging and is critical to their health. Very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; birth weight, <1500 g) infants usually have special dietary needs while showing increased oxidative stress related to intensive care. This prospective cohort study assessed the effect of feeding practice on gut microbiome development and oxidative stress in preterm infants. Fecal samples were collected from each infant in the early (1-2 weeks of enteral feeding) and late (2-4 weeks of enteral feeding) feeding stages. We performed high-throughput sequencing of V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene to analyze the fecal microbiome composition of 20 VLBW preterm infants and to determine the association of gut bacterial composition with feeding practice using an oxidative stress marker (urinary F2-isoprostane). Our results showed that feeding practices in the late stage significantly influenced the gut microbiome composition and oxidative stress in preterm infants. Preterm infants fed human milk + human milk fortifier and only formula diets showed a significant increase in F2-isoprostane levels (P < 0.05) compared with those fed human milk + formula diet. The gut microbiome of the infants fed the human milk + Human milk fortifier diet showed the lower relative abundance of Veillonella (P < 0.05) compared with that of the infants fed the human milk + formula diet. The gut microbiome of the infants fed the only formula diet showed the lowest…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free