Evidence Hub

Gut microbiome signatures in colorectal neoplasia: a cross-sectional study across neoplasia stages and subtypes

P. Louca, Sarah Manning, Eleanor Hackney, Linda Sharp, M. Hull, S. Koo, G. Young, Guy S. Taylor et al.

Gut, 2026

1,762 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background While colorectal cancer (CRC) has been linked to the gut microbiome, it remains unclear whether specific microbial signatures are detectable in precursor lesions such as adenomatous polyps, serrated lesions or sessile serrated lesions. Objective To assess gut microbiome taxonomic and functional associations with colorectal neoplasia presence, severity (non-advanced, advanced and CRC) and subtype and evaluate predictive potential in high-risk neoplasia. Design Analysed cross-sectional stool metagenomes (pre-colonoscopy) from 1762 participants (97% White British) undergoing colonoscopy in the multicentre COLO-COHORT study. Neoplasia was classified per British Society of Gastroenterology surveillance guidelines. Linear mixed-effects models and random forest classifiers assessed taxonomic and functional associations, adjusting for dietary, clinical and lifestyle covariates. Results Gut microbiome composition differences between individuals with and without neoplasia were statistically significant but minimal (R2=0.0008, p=0.03). A small number of species, including Mediterraneibacter faecis and Pseudoruminococcus massiliensis, and microbial pathways, including amino acid biosynthesis and β-lactam resistance, were modestly linked to neoplasia, particularly early lesions (q value <0.05). Associations were generally weak and attenuated after covariate adjustment. Predictive models combining the microbiome with clinical/demographic features modestly improved high-risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,762 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free