Evidence Hub

The Paraguayan gut microbiome contains high abundance of the phylum Actinobacteriota and reveals the influence of health and lifestyle factors

Mauricio Molinas-Vera, Gonzalo Ferreira-Sanabria, P. Peña, Walter J. Sandoval-Espínola

Gut microbes reports, 2024

60 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most gut microbiome studies are focused on populations from developed nations. However, this overlooks the role played by host genetics, lifestyle, and diet, highlighting the need to evaluate under-represented populations. Thus, we performed the first gut microbiome study from a Paraguayan cohort via 16S rRNA sequencing and PICRUSt2 analysis. We evaluated fecal samples from 60 participants from Asunción, while considering categories such as body-mass-index (BMI), sex, age, diet, lifestyle, and clinical history. Firmicutes (76.0 ± 11.6%), Actinobacteriota (10.4 ± 7.9%) and Bacteroidota (9.4 ± 11.4%) were the most abundant phyla. Similarly, the most abundant genera were Blautia (14.1 ± 7.5%), Faecalibacterium (8.07 ± 6.8%), and Bacteroides (6.7 ± 6.8%). Likewise, the most abundant microbial pathways were predicted to be involved with sugar metabolism and fermentation. Interestingly, some categories significantly impacted the gut microbiome composition and function, such as BMI (Moryella, Bifidobacterium), sex (Faecalibacterium), and others. Additionally, dysbiotic indices differed from values previously reported as homeostatic. These observations highlight the need for further studies, considering microbial species and host genetics. Thus, this work expands the knowledge of the gut microbiome from the Collective South, while contrasts found herein reinforce the need for further research with human populations traditionally understudied.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free