Evidence Hub

Association of gut microbiome and oral cavity cancer: A two sample mendelian randomization and case-control study

Xin-Peng Liu, Xinping Li, Menglan Xie, Jin-Yuan Guo, Xiang-Huai Zheng, Shanwei Shi, Qiu Cui, Danya Zhang et al.

Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023

18,340 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Considering the interconnectedness of the oral cavity and gut tract and the presence of abundant natural microbiota in both. We utilized Mendelian Randomization (MR) in a two-sample study to unveil the genetic causal impact of gut microbiota on the development of oral cavity cancer.

MATERIALS & METHODS

The instrumental variables employed in this study consisted of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that demonstrated a robust association with 211 distinct gut microbiota taxa, encompassing a sample size of 18,340 individuals. Our investigation sought to explore the potential causal relationship between these genetic variants and the incidence of oral cavity cancer. To accomplish this, we adopted a random effect inverse variance-weighted approach to analyze the causal effect. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed utilizing Cochran's Q tests, funnel plots, leave-one-out analyses, and MR-Egger intercept tests, to assess the robustness and validity of our findings.

RESULTS

Five gut microbiota taxa (the family Prevotellaceae, the genus Alloprevotella, the genus Erysipelatoclostridium, the genus Parabacteroides, the genus Ruminococcus gauvreauii group) are predicted to play a causal role in promoting the initiation of the risk of oral cavity cancer. While the genus Christensenellaceae R 7 group, the genus Intestinimonas, the genus Ruminococcaceae, and the order Bacillales causally reduce the risk of oral cavity cancer. Furthermore, no significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 18,340 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free