Evidence Hub

Dynamics of the gut microbiome in individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal observational study

Christopher M Rooney, I. Jeffery, K. Mankia, Mark H. Wilcox, P. Emery

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2024

124 participants · 36 citations

Abstract

Objectives This work aimed to resolve the conflicting reports on Prevotellaceae abundance in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to observe structural, functional and temporal changes in the gut microbiome in RA progressors versus non-progressors. Methods Individuals at risk of RA were defined by the presence of anticyclic citrullinated protein (anti-CCP) antibodies and new musculoskeletal symptoms without clinical synovitis. Baseline sampling included 124 participants (30 progressed to RA), with longitudinal sampling of 19 participants (5 progressed to RA) over 15 months at five timepoints. Gut microbiome taxonomic alterations were investigated using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and confirmed with shotgun metagenomic DNA sequencing on 49 samples. Results At baseline, CCP+ at risk progressors showed significant differences in Prevotellaceae abundance compared with non-progressors, contingent on intrinsic RA risk factors and time to progression. Longitudinal sampling revealed gut microbiome instability in progressors 10 months before RA onset, a phenomenon absent in non-progressors. This may indicate a late microbial shift before RA onset, with Prevotellaceae contributing but not dominating these changes. Structural changes in the gut microbiome during arthritis development were associated with increased amino acid metabolism. Conclusion These data suggest conflicting reports on Prevotellaceae overabundance are likely due to sampling within a heterogeneous…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 124 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free