Evidence Hub

Gut microbes related to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score are associated with bone quantity but not with bone quality in a cross-sectional study of older Puerto Rican adults

Lisa C. Merrill, Rafael López Martínez, Natalia Palacios, B. Dawson-Hughes, Sabrina E. Noel, Yan Wang, K. Tucker, Kelsey M. Mangano

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2025

221 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

BMD explains fractures incompletely; studies relating lifestyle to bone quality are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To examine associations of diet quality with bone measures (BMSi, TBS, BMD); evaluate moderation by inflammation; identify gut microbiome features linked to diet quality; and quantify diet-microbiome-bone relationships.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included participants from the Boston Puerto Rican Osteoporosis Study. Diet was assessed with a culturally tailored FFQ, and diet quality with the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score.. BMSi was measured using microindentation; BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); TBS derived from DXA. Inflammation was assessed with a biomarker score (BMS) and tested as a moderator of diet-bone associations via interaction terms in linear regression. Gut microbiome composition (shotgun metagenomics) was analyzed with MaAsLin regression to assess diet associations. A machine learning algorithm determined dietary, microbial, and bone-related predictors of bone health; sample sizes varied by outcome: BMSi (n = 86); TBS (n = 204); BMD femoral neck (n = 220), total hip (n = 221), lumbar spine (n = 207).

RESULTS

DASH score was not associated with BMSi (β = -0.10; 95% CI: -0.46, 0.27; P = 0.60), TBS (β = 0.002; 95% CI: -0.002, 0.005, P = 0.36), BMD at the femoral neck (β = 0.002; 95% CI: -0.002, 0.005; P = 0.30), or lumbar spine (β = 0.002; 95% CI: -0.003, 0.006, P = 0.52 but was at total hip (β = 0.004; 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 221 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free