Evidence Hub

Gut microbiota differences in children classified by extreme physical fitness and physical activity levels from a Chinese Cross-Sectional study

Xiang Pan, Yibo Gao, Yan-Feng Zhang, Koya Suzuki, Jin He, Xiao-Xiao Chen, Lupei Jiang, Ao-Nan Zhang

Scientific Reports, 2025

6,074 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the diversity, structure, dominant microbial populations, and their relationships with physical fitness (PF) and physical activity (PA) metrics within the gut microbiota of children by comparing the gut microbiome composition and functional differences across four groups: low PA-high PF, high PA-high PF, high PA-low PF, and low PA-low PF. A total of 6,074 children aged 6–9 years were selected from full-time ordinary primary and secondary schools. Based on the quartiles of PF and PA, we sampled 120 individuals from each of the four groups (30/group) and collected fecal samples for high-throughput sequencing to analyze the gut microbiome composition. This study revealed that children with high PF exhibited a more abundant and diverse gut microbiome within the same PA level group. Under high PA conditions, the Chao1 and Shannon indices of the high PF group were significantly higher. Different dominant microbial taxa were identified within each group, and specific microbial populations were significantly correlated with various physical and exercise-related indices. This study indicates that the composition of children’s gut microbiota varies significantly based on the combined levels of PA and PF. Children with high PF show greater microbial diversity within similar PA levels, particularly under high PA conditions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 6,074 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free