Evidence Hub

Integrative oral and gut microbiome profiling highlights microbial correlates of complications in type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis

Rong Tang, Mei Shi, Xiaolin Ji, Yan Zhang, L. Fan, Fansu Huang, Xia Li

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

75 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Chronic vascular complications are the primary threat in long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. We examined the associations between oral-gut microbiome dysbiosis and these complications, offering novel insights into therapeutic strategies and underlying mechanisms. This cross-sectional study enrolled 75 T1D participants (disease duration ≥ 10 years) and 43 healthy controls who underwent comprehensive clinical assessment, including blood glucose, lipid profile, and complication-related examinations. Fecal and oral rinse samples were collected for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. T1D participants were stratified by the presence of microvascular (retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy) or macrovascular complications separately. Microbial differences across groups were assessed. Significant differences in oral and gut microbiota compositions were observed between T1D participants with and without complications (both microvascular and macrovascular). A core set of 26 gut and 8 oral microbial species was specifically associated with vascular complications. Butyrate-producing gut bacteria (Blautia wexlerae, Anaerobutyricum hallii, Roseburia inulinivorans, A. soehngenii) and specific oral Neisseria species were enriched in T1D without complications individuals, suggesting protective effects against complications. Mediation analysis indicated associations consistent with partial mediation between certain microbial species and the relationships of glycemic control or insulin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 75 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free