Evidence Hub

Assessing healthcare workers as potential stool donors for faecal microbiota transplantation: a cross-sectional study of antimicrobial-resistant gut bacteria and enteropathogenic microorganisms

María Bonilla-Moreno, Catalina Medina-Gómez, Daiana Guevara-Núñez, L. Saiz-Escobedo, Sara Martí, M. Domínguez, A. Carrera-Salinas, Graciela Rodríguez-Sevilla

Journal of Hospital Infection, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is a procedure designed to modulate the gut microbiome, but identifying reliable stool donors remains challenging. We conducted a study at Bellvitge University Hospital to assess the prevalence of enteropathogenic microorganisms (EPs) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) gut bacteria among healthcare workers (HCWs) and evaluate their potential as stool donors.

METHODS

From November 2022 to April 2023, 106 HCWs were enrolled. Stool samples were tested for a range of EPs using real-time PCR and conventional methods, while AMR gut bacteria were screened using selective culture media. 16SrRNA sequencing was performed, and alpha-diversity was assessed using the Shannon index.

FINDINGS

EPs were found in 48.1% of samples (51/106), with protozoa being the most prevalent (37.7%, 40/106), followed by bacteria (10.4%, 11/106) and viruses (4.7%, 5/106). Blastocystis hominis (33%, 35/106) and Dientamoeba fragilis (18.8%, 20/106) were the most common protozoa, while Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli was the most frequent bacterial pathogen (3.8%, 4/106). Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli was found in 2.8% of samples (3/106). Carbapenemase-producing bacteria, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridioides difficile were not present in any sample. HCWs with B. hominis had significantly higher Shannon alpha-diversity than those without (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of EPs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free