Evidence Hub

Multidimensional Physiological and Gut Microbiome Profiling Identifies Subtle Physiological Patterns in an Apparently Healthy Aging Indian Cohort: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

G. Divyashri, Harini Hutti, Lalitha Prasanna Madduri Venkata, B. Kumar, Ayako Yachie, Samik Ghosh

Microorganisms, 2026

13 participants

Abstract

Aging is characterized by gradual shifts in cellular and physiological processes, even in individuals who remain apparently clinically healthy. These changes reflect a coordinated decline in metabolic efficiency, immune regulation, organ function, psychological resilience, and sleep integrity, domains increasingly recognized as interconnected determinants of apparently healthy aging. This study explored age- and sex-associated patterns in multidimensional physiological domains and gut microbiota features among 45 apparently healthy middle-aged and elderly participants across four age–sex groups (middle-aged males, n = 13; middle-aged females, n = 11; elderly males, n = 13; elderly females, n = 8). Comprehensive clinical, metabolic, inflammatory, hepato-renal, psychological, and sleep parameters were standardized into domain-specific Z-scores, which were integrated into a composite multidimensional physiological health index (MPHI), a systems-level physiological index developed as a proxy for physiological processes associated with mitochondrial function and apparently healthy aging rather than a direct measure of mitochondrial biology. Whole-metagenome sequencing and MetaPhlAn-based taxonomic profiling were used to characterize gut microbiota composition and diversity. Despite no statistically significant overall differences among the four age–sex groups in multivariate analysis (MANOVA, p = 0.103) and gut microbial community structure (PERMANOVA, p = 0.651), descriptive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free