Evidence Hub

Cognitive Impairment Is Associated with Alterations in Diet Quality and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data Collected from the Microbiome in Aging Gut and Brain (MiaGB) Consortium Cohort

A. Arikawa, Anna Waterman, S. Mishra, C. Labyak, Cynthia Williams, Diptaraj S. Chaudhari, Rohit Shukla, Vivek Kumar et al.

Journal of NutriLife, 2025

217 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Background: Research suggests that gut inflammation and alterations in intestinal barrier function may be important mechanisms linking diet, systemic inflammation, and cognitive outcomes. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between diet, cognitive health, and inflammatory markers in older adults. It was hypothesized that cognitive impairment would be associated with lower diet quality and higher levels of inflammatory markers. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the Microbiome in Aging Gut and Brain (MiaGB) consortium cohort. Participants aged 60 years and older were assessed for cognitive status using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), diet quality using the Healthy Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020), and dietary inflammatory potential using the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII). Inflammatory biomarkers were measured in plasma and stool samples, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1). Results: Among 217 participants, 33.6% presented with cognitive impairment based on MoCA scores. There were no differences in DII and HEI-2020 scores between participants with and without cognitive impairment. The only significant finding related to the components of the HEI was a higher adequacy of dairy intake in those without cognitive impairment (54.8%) compared with those with cognitive impairment (44.4%, p=0.035). Key…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 217 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free