Evidence Hub

Exploratory urinary microbiome and metabolome profiles in patients with calcium oxalate kidney stones: a pilot cross-sectional study

Jian-Chao Zhang, Heng Zhang, Yang Xu, Chang-Juan Wang, Xiaopeng Li, Yong-Liang Ni

BMC Nephrology, 2026

12 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kidney stones represent a common urological disorder affecting approximately 14.8% of the global population, with calcium oxalate (CaOx) stones constituting nearly 80% of all cases. Recent studies have revealed a potential association between the gut microbiome and the risk of forming CaOx stones. Additionally, urinary microbiota has been implicated to influence stone development, although the relationship between urinary microbiota and urinary metabolites in patients with calcium oxalate kidney stones remains incompletely characterized.

METHODS

In this pilot cross-sectional study, we used 2bRAD sequencing for microbiome profiling (2bRAD-M) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics to characterize urinary microbial and metabolic features. We analyzed urine samples from a pilot cohort of 12 patients with calcium oxalate kidney stones and 10 healthy controls. Statistical analyses of microbial diversity and metabolomic profiles were conducted to explore between-group differences. To explore microbiome-metabolite associations, we performed Spearman correlation analysis with multiple-testing correction and provided stratified correlation heatmaps as supplementary analyses. This study is registered in the National Medical Research Registry filing system of China (https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn) (No. MR-37-23-016317).

RESULTS

Compared with healthy controls, patients with calcium oxalate kidney stones showed exploratory differences in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free