Evidence Hub

Relationships between barley consumption and gut microbiome characteristics in a healthy Japanese population: a cross-sectional study

Tsubasa Matsuoka, Koji Hosomi, Jonguk Park, Yuka Goto, Mao Nishimura, Satoko Maruyama, H. Murakami, Kana Konishi et al.

BMC Nutrition, 2021

236 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Background Barley contains abundant soluble beta-glucan fibers, which have established health benefits. In addition, the health benefits conferred by the gut bacteria have attracted considerable interest. However, few studies have focused on the barley consumption and gut bacteria of the Japanese population. In this study, we aimed to identify the relationship between the barley consumption and gut bacteria composition of the Japanese population. Methods In total, 236 participants were recruited in Japan, and 94 participants with no complications of diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia were selected for the study. We analyzed fecal samples from the participants, their medical check-up results, and responses to questionnaires about dietary habits. The participants were grouped according to their median barley consumption. Then, we assessed the relative abundance of 50 genera. Characteristic bacteria were evaluated for their relationship with barley consumption by multiple regression analysis, adjusted for disease and dietary habits, in all participants. We also analyzed the networks and clustering of the 20 selected genera. Results According to the comparison between barley groups, Bifidobacterium , Butyricicoccus , Collinsella , Ruminococcus 2, and Dialister were characteristic candidate bacterias of the group that consumed large amounts of barley ( P < 0.05). The relationship between barley consumption and Bifidobacterium remained after adjusting for disease and dietary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 236 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free