Evidence Hub

Source-tracking Klebsiella outbreaks in premature infants using a novel amplicon fingerprinting method

Adam P. Matson, Katrin Unterhauser, K. Rezaul, Stephanie Lesmes, Yan-Jiao Zhou, I. Michelow, Naveed Hussain, M. Driscoll

Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Even with state-of-the-art infection control practices, premature infants can develop life-threatening infections in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The precise sources of most NICU-associated infections frequently remain unknown and, therefore, are difficult to address. In this study, we used a novel microbiome sequencing approach to source-track lethal sepsis-causing Klebsiella, opportunistic pathogens, and commensal bacterial strains colonizing the gut of hospitalized premature infants. An exploratory-methods, case series was at performed Connecticut Children’s Medical Center NICU in 2021. Long-read 16–23 S rRNA gene sequencing was used to analyze fecal samples, mother’s milk, and clinical bacterial isolates derived from a cluster of Klebsiella-infected, and concurrently hospitalized non-infected, premature infants who were simultaneously enrolled in a neonatal microbiome study. Distinct groups of amplicons comprising a unique fingerprint pattern for a given strain were compared among the samples to ascertain relatedness. We confirmed 100% amplicon identity between lethal Klebsiella quasipneumoniae from milk, gut, blood and trachea during sepsis in twins, while differentiating other infecting and colonizing Klebsiella strains in concurrently hospitalized premature infants. The method also successfully discriminated between multiple Klebsiella strains within the gut microbiota of a non-infected infant. Additionally, we showed that human milk is the source of many…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free