Evidence Hub

Gut microbial dysbiosis in individuals with Sjögren’s disease

R. Mendez, Arjun Watane, M. Farhangi, Kara M. Cavuoto, T. Leith, S. Budree, A. Galor, Santanu Banerjee

bioRxiv, 2019

21 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the gut microbiome in individuals with Sjögrens and correlate bacterial profiles to dry eye (DE) measures. Methods Prospective case series of individuals with confirmed (n=13) and unconfirmed (n=8) Sjögrens (n=21; cases) as compared to healthy controls (n=10). Stool was analyzed by 16S pyrosequencing and associations between bacterial classes and DE symptoms and signs were examined. Results Firmicutes was the dominant phylum in the gut, comprising 40-60% of all phyla. On a phyla level, subjects with Sjögrens (confirmed and unconfirmed) had depletion of Firmicutes (1.1- fold) and an expansion of Proteobacteria (3.0-fold), Actinobacteria (1.7-fold), and Bacteroidetes (1.3-fold) compared to controls. Shannon’s diversity index showed no differences between groups with respect to the numbers of different OTUs encountered (diversity) and the instances these unique OTUs were sampled (evenness). On the other hand, Faith’s phylogenetic diversity showed increased diversity in cases vs controls, which reached significance when comparing confirmed Sjögrens and controls (13.57 ± 0.89 and 10.96 ± 0.76, p=0.02). Using Principle Co-ordinate Analysis, qualitative differences in microbial composition were noted with differential clustering of cases and controls. Dimensionality reduction and clustering of complex microbial data further showed differences between the three groups, with regard to microbial composition, association and clustering. Finally, differences in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free