Evidence Hub

Spinal Cord Diffuse Midline Glioma, H3K27M- mutant Effectively Treated with Bevacizumab: A Report of Two Cases

Satoru Yabuno, S. Kawauchi, Michiari Umakoshi, A. Uneda, K. Fujii, Joji Ishida, Yoshihiro Otani, Yasuhiko Hattori et al.

NMC Case Report Journal, 2021

16 citations

Abstract

“Diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant” was newly classified in the revised World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification of central nervous system tumors. Spinal cord DMG, H3K27M-mutant is relatively rare, with poor prognosis, and there are no effective treatment protocols. In this study, we report two cases of spinal cord DMG, H3K27M-mutant treated with bevacizumab. The two patients were women in their 40s who initially presented with sensory impairment. MRI showed spinal intramedullary tumors, and each patient underwent laminectomy/laminoplasty and biopsy of the tumors. Histological examination initially suggested low-grade astrocytoma in case 1 and glioblastoma in case 2. Upon further immunohistochemical examination in case 1 and molecular examination in case 2, however, both cases were diagnosed as DMG, H3K27M-mutant. Case 1 was treated with radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, which induced a transient improvement of symptoms; 3 months after surgery, however, the patient’s symptoms rapidly deteriorated. MRI showed tumor enlargement with edema to the medulla. Triweekly administration of bevacizumab improved her symptoms for the following 12 months. Case 2 was treated with bevacizumab from the beginning because of acute deterioration of breathing. After bevacizumab administration, both cases showed tumor regression on MRI and drastic improvement of symptoms within a few days. Although spinal cord DMG, H3K27M-mutant has an aggressive clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free