Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Morriss S, Foo CH, Lin E, Rodrigues Dias F, Kushnir-Grinbaum D, FitzGerald H, Leemaqz S, Lee S et al.

American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026

4,141 participants

Abstract

Background: Alopecia areata is an autoimmune disorder characterised by T-cell-mediated damage of hair follicles, resulting in non-scarring hair loss that can progress to complete scalp (alopecia totalis) or body hair loss (alopecia universalis). While long-term systemic options were historically limited, the emergence of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of alopecia areata, even in patients with moderate-to-severe disease.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral JAK inhibitors compared with placebo in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe alopecia areata.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to 28 November, 2025. Randomised controlled trials evaluating oral JAK inhibitors in adolescents and adults (aged ≥12 years) with alopecia areata were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who achieved Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores of ≤10 and ≤20, and 50%, 75% and 90% reductions in SALT scores from baseline, as well as treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Data were synthesised using random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Twelve randomised controlled trials involving 4141 participants (mean age 35.8 years, mean baseline SALT score 86.0) met…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,141 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free