Evidence Hub

Creatine supplementation (3 g/day) and bone health in older women: a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

L. Sales, A. Pinto, Samara Ferrari Rodrigues, J. Alvarenga, N. Gonçalves, M. Sampaio-Barros, F. Benatti, B. Gualano et al.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2020

41 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Creatine supplementation could be a non-expensive, safe and effective dietary intervention to counteract bone loss. The aim of this study was to investigate whether long-term creatine supplementation can improve bone health in older, postmenopausal women.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized trial was conducted between November 2011 and December 2017 in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Two hundred postmenopausal women with osteopenia were randomly allocated to receive either creatine monohydrate (3 g/day) or placebo over 2 years. At baseline and after 12 and 24 months, we assessed areal bone mineral density (aBMD; primary outcome), lean and fat mass (through dual X-ray absorptiometry), volumetric BMD and bone microarchitecture parameters, biochemical bone markers, physical function and strength, and the number of falls and fractures. Possible adverse effects were self-reported.

RESULTS

Lumbar spine (p0.050). Bone markers, microarchitecture parameters, and the number of falls/fractures were not changed with creatine (all p>0.050). Lean mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass increased throughout the intervention (p<0.001), with no additive effect of creatine (p=0.731 and p=0.397, respectively). Creatine did not affect health-related laboratory parameters.

CONCLUSION

Creatine supplementation over 2 years did not improve bone health in older, postmenopausal women with osteopenia, nor did it affect lean mass or muscle function in this…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free