Evidence Hub

Supplement-based nutritional strategies to tackle frailty: A multifactorial, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

H. Roschel, A. P. Hayashi, Alan L. Fernandes, J. C. Jambassi-Filho, Victoria Hevia-Larraín, M. D. de Capitani, Davi A Santana, L. S. Gonçalves et al.

Clinical Nutrition, 2021

154 participants · 54 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia plays a central role in the development of frailty syndrome. Nutrition and exercise are cornerstone strategies to mitigate the transition to frailty; however, there is a paucity of evidence for which dietary and exercise strategies are effective.

OBJECTIVE

This large, multifactorial trial investigated the efficacy of different dietary strategies to enhance the adaptations to resistance training in pre-frail and frail elderly.

METHODS

This was a single-site 16-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Clinical Hospital, School of Medicine - University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Four integrated, sub-investigations were conducted to compare: 1) leucine vs. placebo; 2) whey vs. soy vs. placebo; 3) creatine vs. whey vs. creatine plus whey vs. placebo; 4) women vs. men in response to whey. Sub-investigations 1 to 3 were conducted in women, only. Two-hundred participants (154 women/46 men, mean age 72 ± 6 years) underwent a twice-a-week, resistance training program. The main outcomes were muscle function (assessed by dynamic and isometric strength and functional tests) and lean mass (assessed by DXA). Muscle cross-sectional area, health-related quality of life, bone and fat mass, and biochemical markers were also assessed.

RESULTS

We observed that leucine supplementation was ineffective to improve muscle mass and function. Supplementation with whey and soy failed to enhance resistance-training effects. Similarly,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 154 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free