Evidence Hub

Outpatient care compared with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial in low-risk patients

Carratalà J, Fernández-Sabé N, Ortega L, Castellsagué X, Rosón B, Dorca J, Fernández-Agüera A, Verdaguer R et al.

Annals of internal medicine, 2005

224 participants · 237 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) has been advocated as an objective measure of risk stratification to help determine the initial site of treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outpatient care of PSI-defined low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia is as safe and effective as hospitalization.

DESIGN: Unblinded, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING: 2 tertiary care hospitals.

PATIENTS: 224 immunocompetent adults in risk class II or III (PSI scores <or=90 points) who received a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department and had no extenuating circumstances.

INTERVENTION: Outpatient care with oral levofloxacin therapy or hospitalization with sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin therapy.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was the percentage of patients with an overall successful outcome at the end of treatment, according to 7 predefined criteria. Secondary end points included patients' quality of life and satisfaction.

RESULTS: Overall successful outcome was achieved in 83.6% of outpatients and 80.7% of hospitalized patients (absolute difference, 2.9 percentage points [95% CI, -7.1 to 12.9 percentage points]). More outpatients were satisfied with their overall care (91.2% vs. 79.1%; absolute difference, 12.1 percentage points [CI, 1.8 to 22.5 percentage points]). Quality of life and the percentages of patients with adverse drug reactions (9.1% vs. 9.6%), medical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 224 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free